In 2007. Massachusetts created a 35 foot “buffer zone” in front of abortion clinics where protesters weren’t allowed to stand and harass or verbally abuse women and doctors express their dislike of abortion procedures. There are 10 various buffer laws in the nation to protect patients and doctors at clinics where violence against them is threatened often and even carried out.
Are? I meant were. There were 10 of these laws until Thursday when the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the buffer zone laws. Their explanation said that these buffer zones put a “serious burden” on protesters who merely wanted to “speak” and “counsel” patients going into the clinic.
…
What about the burden that is placed on doctors who have to worry about getting murdered for doing their job? The buffer zone laws originally passed as a response to the fatal shootings of two abortion clinic staff members in Brookline. What about the burden that being called a slutty murdering whore puts on the women trying to obtain their constitutional right to an abortion? These protesters don’t know anything about the women or doctors they yell at and harass. They’re not going to be speaking or counseling these women. These protesters most likely aren’t certified to counsel anyone and they never just “speak” to the patients.
The Attorney General, Martha Coakley, defended the buffer laws. In response to their destruction, she has vowed to protect doctorws and patients.
“We will utilize all of the tools we have available to protect everyone from harassment, threats, and physical obstruction,” said Coakley, adding that her office’s Civil Rights Division was prepared to issue injunctions against “those who would threaten or harass.”
The buffer zone laws do not prohibit free speech. Protesters are welcome to stand behind the painted yellow lines and say what they wish. They aren’t being told they can’t protest or say what they want.
If making zones where protesting is illegal is against the constitution, then we should abolish the 252 foot buffer zone that Supreme Court Justices have the privilege of enjoying. Demonstrations and protests are banned on the plaza and front steps of the Supreme Court, meaning that people protesting the SCOTUS must deal with the “serious burden” of being nearly 300 feet from the court.
I believe that the anti-abortion protesters have the right to say what they like and protest what they want. That’s the beauty of America. But they don’t have to block sidewalks- which has gotta be a fire hazard- and freedom of speech does not mean freedom to harass and “counsel” women in conversations they don’t want to have.
These buffer zones protected patients and doctors alike. They made the space around clinics safer and calmer and made the clinis more accessible. There have been so many assassinations of abortion providers that these buffer zones saved lives. If the SCOTUS can have a buffer zone- and a 252 foot one at that- then people who legitimately can get killed for doing their job should certainly be provided with a 35 foot safety zone
Layout of the area around and Planned Parenthood in Boston.